18
Jul
07

Peter King gets called out; proceeds to lose it

Wrong pickYou may recall a few days ago when we called out Peter King for his pre-preseason NFL rankings.

Pete had the Colts first, New England second, San Diego third, so on and so forth. Anyway, we weren’t so much frustrated with the teams (or their order) – just that there were actually power rankings of NFL teams in July.

And, evidently, readers of Kings column weren’t too happy with his predictions either. That’s what you get for midsummer power rankings Pete.

Anyway, he kind of went off in his rebuttal column, which is fairly funny in itself.

Granted, he does do a mailbag often, but this one is basically him defending every pick he made as readers call him out. Good stuff.

Before King explains his picks, he tells the readers why the rankings aren’t the way people thought they should be:

And before I get to your e-mails, I’d like to point something out about columns like mine. It would be fairly easy and extraordinarily uninteresting to take last year’s standings, figure in the offseason moves each team has made, and put the teams in logical order based precisely on what appears to be the way the season will go. It’d be a cookie-cutter exercise.

Wouldn’t the definition of “preseason power rankings” be taking “last year’s standings, figure in the offseason moves each team has made, and put the teams in logical order based precisely on what appears to be the way the season will go”?

Basically, Pete is saying he didn’t do that just to shake things up. I’m not sure about you, but that strikes me as odd. It’s writing something just to get a response – even worse than cookie-cutter writing.

King says (a huge revelation) that the season never goes the way we think it’s going to. That’s true Pete, but power rankings are not predicting how the season is going to go, they are telling us which team is in the best position at the start of the season. It’s not a playoff bracket predictor.

Point is, if you’re a journalist, never justify your story by saying, “well, I could have written what everyone wanted me to, but that wouldn’t shake things up!” When you start digging that grave, you end up defending your ranking of the Bengals sounding like a homer defending his favorite team

You’re better than that King.

Advertisements

1 Response to “Peter King gets called out; proceeds to lose it”


  1. July 18, 2007 at 11:15 am

    I read King from time to time. Given his access to players and coaches, he often adds a personal touch to a national story. He done write purty good too. However, as a source for game predictions or pre-season rankings…not so much. The venom of his readers is amusing though.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: